Entrapment occurs when law enforcement induces someone to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. In Internet sex crime cases, especially those involving stings and undercover operations, entrapment is a recurring issue. Police may initiate conversations, escalate the dialogue, or misrepresent identities, leading to questionable conduct.
To successfully argue entrapment, it must be shown that the idea to commit the crime originated with the officers and that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the offense. We scrutinize digital transcripts, chat logs, and law enforcement procedures to uncover overreach and misconduct that can lead to a dismissal.
Digital Forensics: The Key to Many Defenses
Digital evidence is central to every Internet sex crime case, making digital forensics a cornerstone of defense. This involves expert analysis of computers, smartphones, cloud data, and digital footprints to determine what content exists, how it got there, and whether the accused had control over it.
Skilled forensic teams can uncover deleted files, metadata, login logs, and remote access indicators. In many cases, malware or unauthorized third-party access may explain incriminating content. We work with digital forensic specialists to challenge the accuracy, origin, and authenticity of key digital evidence.
Search and Seizure in Cybercrime Investigations
Unlawful searches and seizures are among the most powerful defense angles in cybercrime cases. Under the Fourth Amendment, a valid search warrant is required to access a suspect’s digital devices. However, errors in warrant scope, execution, or supporting affidavits can make all evidence inadmissible in court.
We investigate every detail of the warrant process—who signed it, what it covered, when it was served, and how it was executed. If officers exceeded the warrant’s limitations or collected evidence before obtaining authorization, a motion to suppress can derail the prosecution’s entire case.